Posts Tagged federal

Why did Clinton fire all 93 federal attorneys?

wasnt there a better way than that to get rid of the one guy who was working on Clinton’s criminal activity regarding whitewater

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , ,

What does the word “Federal” really mean?

This was sent to me and raises some interesting concepts.

——————————————————————————–

IN CASE YOU MISSED THIS

WHAT DOES FEDERAL REALLY MEAN

You always hear the phrase, pay your federal income tax . Now just what does this phrase consist of? Five words. The use of the word Federal is very important because all people believe it to mean the Federal government has an income tax that you must pay. But, why is it that no court will come down on the Private IRS when it says it collects for federal tax? It is proven to be private and an arm of the federal Reserve. This federal Reserve controls “The Bank” and the “International Monetary Fund”. Instead of going into the proofs by statute and making this a long writing, we find that the agents of the IRS are controlled by foreign operatives, namely the Governor of the IMF and the second alternate should he die, quit etc.. That is the Alien Property Custodian, who you know as the Attorney General of the United States. Both He and the Secretary of the Treasury under 26 U.S.C. 7401, are who all agents take their directive orders. Are they collecting for the federal government a “federal” income tax? No they are not. Now we come to those five little words of the above phrase and one word is federal. We all were taught it meant the national government. Well I think you are going to be very surprised as to what follows on that little misinterpreted word “Federal as we trace back it’s origin, called eytomolgy.

From the 1828 Webster’s Dictionary
FEDERAL– a. from L. faedus, a league, allied perhaps to Eng. Wed, Sax . Weddian,* * *.

1. Pertaining to a league or contract; derived from an agreement or covenant between parties , particularly between nations.

So the real meaning of “federal” is a contract or agreement and has nothing to do with a particular type government, although it was a contract that formed government. So to get the point across I will use “federal” in place of contract or agreement as they are one in the same. Well now, IRS is private agency. You federal with IRS when filing any form under perjury, i.e. W-4, 1040 or any IRS FORM . Your signature compels you to the”federal” that you owe an obligation to the “parties” as listed above. Note it said parties and nothing to do with government in it’s federal makeup. It said particular to, but not inclusive. The next Webster’s defining of the word will show it is not exclusive to nations.

2. Consisting in a compact between parties , particularly and chiefly between states or nations; YOU ARE NOT MENTIONED HERE AS YOU HAVE NO CONTRACT WITH A STATE OR A NATION. As stated by the judge in the Padleford case;

“But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The States are the parties to it. And they may complain. If they do they are entitled to redress. Or they may waive the right to complain.”

Right here is all the proof you need that you are not a party to any compact ( contract/Agreement) with the federal government or state government for that matter under any constitution.

So we move on in #2 of Webster’s definition; founded on alliance by contract or mutual agreement; * * . Your mutual agreement is with a private organization using the word “federal” in a fraud, because of people’s ignorance. Remember words are used against you every time it is in the criminal’s best interest. Now when you look at Black’s Law dictionary, they are carefully couched in constitutional terms and nations and compacts between the states and never use “Federal” as defined by Webster’s. Even Ballentine’s uses it, as does Blacks. Now let’s move to present day ( 1969) Webster’s 7 th Collegiate Dictionary. This now states what The Law dictionaries state and has thrown out the etymology of the word federal so you would have no idea it means a contract between parties, leading you to believe everything “federal” pertains to government. Humm, ok, so what about federal express? Does that mean government express? So I happen to have a 1911 Webster’s unabridged dictionary and the definition of “federal” is exactly word for word, the same as the 1828 Dictionary. So what happened in 1913 that changed the definition of “federal” to mean only pertaining to government? Think. Words are changed by men to mean what they want it to mean. The Random House Dictionary 1967 uses Webster’s 1828 definition, but also includes what the Law dictionaries define federal as. Here is proof as to how a word changes over the years by men that want control by starting to shove aside what “federal” really means. So the real word “FEDERAL” meant contract between men
( parties) or agreement between them. So now you have a federal with the IRS and you, in the forms or statement you sign. When IRS takes you to court, that judge is sitting in equity due to that federal between you and the IRS, and he rightly rules always in favor of the IRS because you are breaching the federal (contract) you voluntarily made with them. For your “federal income tax” is in reality a contract tax, which you pay the private IRS for the use of the federal reserve note. This is a simple explanation because you would have to read all I have written on admiralty, the foreign control by the international bankers and the control of the private bar Assn. over the equity contract you placed yourself in, by signing the agreement of the IRS FORM, no matter what it might be. Now this is where the UCC kicks in and there are cases I have posted from time to time that proves they operate in UCC due to your “federal” with them. Sounds odd when you describe that contract with them doesn’t it? The cases are : UNITED STATES v. KIMBELL FOODS, INC., ET AL. No. 77-1359 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 440 U.S. 715; 99 S. Ct. 1448; 1979 U.S. LEXIS 30; 59 L. Ed. 2d 711; 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. (MB) 1; 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1 and FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FORT WORTH, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. No. 555-83C, UNITED STATES CLAIMS COURT 8 Cl. Ct. 774; 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1583, September 27, 1985.

That is your “voluntary nature” of the private income tax, under fraud of the use of words to ensnare you. Once voluntary it then becomes mandatory to “pay your contract ( federal) income tax” . The Informer 2007

This was sent to me and raises some interesting concepts.

——————————————————————————–

IN CASE YOU MISSED THIS

WHAT DOES FEDERAL REALLY MEAN

You always hear the phrase, pay your federal income tax . Now just what does this phrase consist of? Five words. The use of the word Federal is very important because all people believe it to mean the Federal government has an income tax that you must pay. But, why is it that no court will come down on the Private IRS when it says it collects for federal tax? It is proven to be private and an arm of the federal Reserve. This federal Reserve controls “The Bank” and the “International Monetary Fund”. Instead of going into the proofs by statute and making this a long writing, we find that the agents of the IRS are controlled by foreign operatives, namely the Governor of the IMF and the second alternate should he die, quit etc.. That is the Alien Property Custodian, who you know as the Attorney General of the United States. Both He and the Secretary of the Treasury under 26 U.S.C. 7401, are who all agents take their directive orders. Are they collecting for the federal government a “federal” income tax? No they are not. Now we come to those five little words of the above phrase and one word is federal. We all were taught it meant the national government. Well I think you are going to be very surprised as to what follows on that little misinterpreted word “Federal as we trace back it’s origin, called eytomolgy.

From the 1828 Webster’s Dictionary
FEDERAL– a. from L. faedus, a league, allied perhaps to Eng. Wed, Sax . Weddian,* * *.

1. Pertaining to a league or contract; derived from an agreement or covenant between parties , particularly between nations.

So the real meaning of “federal” is a contract or agreement and has nothing to do with a particular type government, although it was a contract that formed government. So to get the point across I will use “federal” in place of contract or agreement as they are one in the same. Well now, IRS is private agency. You federal with IRS when filing any form under perjury, i.e. W-4, 1040 or any IRS FORM . Your signature compels you to the”federal” that you owe an obligation to the “parties” as listed above. Note it said parties and nothing to do with government in it’s federal makeup. It said particular to, but not inclusive. The next Webster’s defining of the word will show it is not exclusive to nations.

2. Consisting in a compact between parties , particularly and chiefly between states or nations; YOU ARE NOT MENTIONED HERE AS YOU HAVE NO CONTRACT WITH A STATE OR A NATION. As stated by the judge in the Padleford case;

“But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The States are the parties to it. And they may complain. If they do they are entitled to redress. Or they may waive the right to complain.”

Right here is all the proof you need that you are not a party to any compact ( contract/Agreement) with the federal government or state government for that matter under any constitution.

So we move on in #2 of Webster’s definition; founded on alliance by contract or mutual agreement; * * . Your mutual agreement is with a private organization using the word “federal” in a fraud, because of people’s ignorance. Remember words are used against you every time it is in the criminal’s best interest. Now when you look at Black’s Law dictionary, they are carefully couched in constitutional terms and nations and compacts between the states and never use “Federal” as defined by Webster’s. Even Ballentine’s uses it, as does Blacks. Now let’s move to present day ( 1969) Webster’s 7 th Collegiate Dictionary. This now states what The Law dictionaries state and has thrown out the etymology of the word federal so you would have no idea it means a contract between parties, leading you to believe everything “federal” pertains to government. Humm, ok, so what about federal express? Does that mean government express? So I happen to have a 1911 Webster’s unabridged dictionary and the definition of “federal” is exactly word for word, the same as the 1828 Dictionary. So what happened in 1913 that changed the definition of “federal” to mean only pertaining to government? Think. Words are changed by men to mean what they want it to mean. The Random House Dictionary 1967 uses Webster’s 1828 definition, but also includes what the Law dictionaries define federal as. Here is proof as to how a word changes over the years by men that want control by starting to shove aside what “federal” really means. So the real word “FEDERAL” meant contract between men
( parties) or agreement between them. So now you have a federal with the IRS and you, in the forms or statement you sign. When IRS takes you to court, that judge is sitting in equity due to that federal between you and the IRS, and he rightly rules always in favor of the IRS because you are breaching the federal (contract) you voluntarily made with them. For your “federal income tax” is in reality a contract tax, which you pay the private IRS for the use of the federal reserve note. This is a simple explanation because you would have to read all I have written on admiralty, the foreign control by the international bankers and the control of the private bar Assn. over the equity contract you placed yourself in, by signing the agreement of the IRS FORM, no matter what it might be. Now this is where the UCC kicks in and there are cases I have posted from time to time that proves they operate in UCC due to your “federal” with them. Sounds odd when you describe that contract with them doesn’t it? The cases are : UNITED STATES v. KIMBELL FOODS, INC., ET AL. No. 77-1359 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 440 U.S. 715; 99 S. Ct. 1448; 1979 U.S. LEXIS 30; 59 L. Ed. 2d 711; 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. (MB) 1; 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1 and FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FORT WORTH, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. No. 555-83C, UNITED STATES CLAIMS COURT 8 Cl. Ct. 774; 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1583, September 27, 1985.

That is your “voluntary nature” of the private income tax, under fraud of the use of words to ensnare you. Once voluntary it then becomes mandatory to “pay your contract ( federal) income tax” . The Informer 2007
Sorry that it was entered twice—do not have space to give you the research you can do for yourself—-Common sense tells you that if your payment of income tax check is deposited somewhere other than to the account of the United States of America Treasury, something is wrong. Look at the endorsement on the back of same.
Sorry that it was entered twice—do not have space to give you the research you can do for yourself—-Common sense tells you that if your payment of income tax check is deposited somewhere other than to the account of the United States of America Treasury, something is wrong. Look at the endorsement on the back of same.
This question has as yet no answer—-

What does “Federal” really mean?

Moderator should post—No Best Answer.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , ,

How Federal Criminal Cases Differ from State Cases

How Federal Criminal Cases Differ from State Cases


Free Online Articles Directory




Why Submit Articles?
Top Authors
Top Articles
FAQ
ABAnswers

Publish Article

0 && $.browser.msie ) {
var ie_version = parseInt($.browser.version);
if(ie_version Login


Login via


Register
Hello
My Home
Sign Out

Email

Password


Remember me?
Lost Password?

Home Page > Law > How Federal Criminal Cases Differ from State Cases

How Federal Criminal Cases Differ from State Cases

Posted: Oct 02, 2010 |Comments: 0
|




]]>

 

As an experienced lawyer in Charleston, South Carolina, Stephen Harris of the Law Office of Stephen Harris has handled many criminal cases on behalf of his clients. According to Harris, finding out that criminal charges are being brought against you is undoubtedly a trying time. And that stress is only multiplied when you discover that these charges are federal.

 

If you are thrown into the midst of having to defend yourself against legal accusations and charges, then it can be quite difficult to understand all of the legalities of your situation. Luckily, you don’t have to go it alone. In fact, regardless of everything that has happened up until this point, including the activity or event that you are being charged for, one of the best things you can do for yourself moving forward is to hire the proper legal representation.

 

As both a state and federal criminal defense lawyer in Charleston, I know that federal cases are handled more critically while any legal case from a misdemeanor to a lawsuit must be taken seriously. The government doesn’t like to lose a case, which means that you can guarantee that the road ahead of you must be taken seriously and that there is very little room for error. That is why you first have to examine how federal cases differ from charges that are brought against you by the state.

]]>

 

Different Rules

In general, state court is driven by past precedents and decisions that have been made within that state previously. And while the laws and guidelines are taken very seriously, when compared to cases that are held in federal court, state cases don’t require quite as much preparation and diligence.

 

On the other hand, federal court is ruled by constitutional law. This includes many crimes that are deemed as “white-collar,” such as insider trading, as well as crimes committed against government agencies like the FCC or Department of Education and any crimes that take place across various state lines. Additionally, in federal criminal court, there is a federal grand jury that decides the fate of your case, and this jury sits for a month as opposed to the standard week that a jury meets for in a state criminal case.

 

What You and Your Attorney Should Do

I suggest that you and your lawyer prepare differently for a federal case. It’s very likely that the government has a strong case against you and has been spending months, if not longer, gathering evidence and testimony. There are also many more laws that need to be taken into consideration; and since the verdict will ultimately be governed in large part by the constitution, there is very little room for variance. Though this may not mean very much to you as the defendant, it does mean that you have to be completely honest and cooperative with your lawyer.

 

Keep in mind that hiding anything from your lawyer will probably only hurt your case. You’ll need to disclose any information you know about the evidence that the government has against you, and you’ll need to share any communication you’ve had with the government as well. In federal cases, more so often than state criminal cases, there is a strong likelihood that your case will settle out of court. However, even though it may seem like your case will settle, you and your attorney should always be prepared to move further into the stages of an actual trial.

 

To make sure that the outcome of your particular case, whether federal or state, is as positive as can be, it’s important that you hire an experienced attorney such as myself or my partner Ted Huge who practices federal litigation, and who has the experience and knowledge to represent you.

 

This article is for informational purposes only.  You should not rely on this article as a legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances, and you should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.  Publication of this article and your receipt of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship.

 

Start increasing your traffic today just by submitting articles with us, click here to get started.
Liked this article? Click here to publish it on your website or blog, it’s free and easy!

Stephen Harris -
About the Author:

Stephen Harris is a writer for Yodle, a business directory and online advertising company. Find a<a rel=”nofollow” onclick=”javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/outgoing/article_exit_link/3387555']);” href=”<a rel=”nofollow” onclick=”javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/outgoing/article_exit_link/3387555']);” href=”http://local.yodle.com/articles”>http://local.yodle.com/articles”>lawyer</a> or more <a rel=”nofollow” onclick=”javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/outgoing/article_exit_link/3387555']);” href=” http://local.yodle.com/articles/topics/legal-services/”>lawyers</a> articles at Yodle Consumer Guide.

 

]]>
Questions and Answers

Ask our experts your Law related questions here…

Ask

200 Characters left

Does medicare differ from state to state?
How many vacation days do federal employees get ?
What is the difference between an FBI Criminal Record Check and a state level Criminal Record Check?

Rate this Article

1
2
3
4
5

vote(s)
0 vote(s)

Feedback

Print

Re-Publish

0) {
ch_selected = Math.floor(Math.random()*ch_queries.length);
if(ch_selected == ch_queries.length) ch_selected–;
ch_query = ch_queries[ch_selected];
}
}catch(e){
ch_query = document.title;
}
]]>

Source:  http://www.articlesbase.com/law-articles/how-federal-criminal-cases-differ-from-state-cases-3387555.html

Article Tags:
defense lawyer, federal criminal cases

Related Videos

Related Articles

Latest Law Articles
More from Stephen Harris


Being a Criminal Defense Attorney

Peter Schaffer, criminal defense attorney, talks about how he has interesting cases, scary clients. He also talks about how to defend guilty clients. (04:35)


Google Near Deal in Government Criminal Probe

The tech giant is said to be paying $500 million in a case over ads from online pharmacies. Plus: Mortgage rates hit new lows. (01:13)


‘Changes Needed’ After Milly Case

The man who oversaw the police investigation into the murder of schoolgirl Milly Dowler has called for changes to the criminal justice system. (01:12)


Expungement Process

And now, for this next trick, we’ll file a petition to make your case disappear! (01:46)


Legal Disclosure

As my cousin Vinny learned, prosecutors who keep too many secrets can lose many cases. (01:30)

Select best Tacoma criminal defense lawyer for your case

Are you facing a criminal case and unable to cope with the dangerous situation in life?

By:
Pierce countyl

Law>
Criminall
May 27, 2011

Criminal Defense Lawyer: Top Selections

Whether you are looking for a criminal defense lawyer, federal criminal lawyer, or any other type, the most important thing is that you choose one that has lots of experience. You want a lawyer that has been around the block and back, one who has dealt with enough cases that they will have seen tons like yours before and know just how to react and win the case.

By:
Floyd P. Dietzl

Law>
National, State, Locall
Jan 14, 2010

A VIEW ON CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER

A criminal lawyer is one who is expertise in handling different types of case and law related to crime. The ultimate task of this law person is to offer its services to the people who are been charged under the crime act and sue the accused for such crime.

By:
NealDavisl

Law>
Criminall
Jun 08, 2010

Why Hire a Federal Criminal Attorney Dallas

If you arrested on a criminal charge, the first thing that comes to your mind is fear. Often, people don’t know the right course of action once they have been arrested.

By:
nehasmo1l

Law>
Personal Injuryl
Aug 03, 2011

What You Need To Know If you Are Arrested For federal criminal Charges

The process fro federal criminal defense is different then stat criminal charges. The purpose of this article is to discuss the facts and offer some detailed information to assist in choosing a lawyer.

By:
lisal

Law>
Criminall
Jun 26, 2011

Discover Legitimate DWI Law in Dallas Texas

There may well be a time during the time you or someone that you understand close to you falls under a complaint off DWI ; one must always then organize to face the conflict head on, since the laws of DWI under the arms of Dallas Texas can be really harsh. Hence detecting the Best DWI attorneys in Dallas will probably be important to get a defence in your favor.

By:
izhvano hmbll
Lawl
Sep 10, 2011

Family Law Software Enhances Productivity of Legal Professionals

Family Laws in the US govern pre-nuptial agreements, marriages, domestic relationships, adoption, spousal abuse, dissolution of marriages and consequent issues like support, property division, child support and custody.

By:
Rick Kabral
Lawl
Sep 10, 2011

Legality of Search and Seizure Procedure

Challenging the legality of a search and seizure may help in the defense against a criminal charge. Get a good lawyer for help if you are in such trouble.

By:
Dave Watsonl
Lawl
Sep 09, 2011

DUI Case Involving Out-of-State Individual

Finding yourself facing a drunk driving charge while on vacation may be a difficult situation. Get a competent lawyer for help to avoid serious legal consequences.

By:
Dave Watsonl
Lawl
Sep 09, 2011

Responsibilities of Your Criminal Attorney

Preparing for your defense is not the only task of a criminal attorney. He/she needs to handle other important things as well including helping you understand the legal process, filing motions, and so on.

By:
Dave Watsonl
Lawl
Sep 09, 2011

Defend Yourself against Credit Card Fraud

Stephen Harris is the owner of the Law Office of Stephen Harris and a renowned federal criminal defense lawyer in Charleston, South Carolina. According to Harris, defending yourself against credit card fraud can be extremely difficult because the facts are often stacked up against you in these types of cases.

By:
Stephen Harrisl
Lawl
Oct 02, 2010

What Is Involved in Financing Your Defense

Stephen Harris is the owner of the Law Office of Stephen Harris and an experienced criminal defense attorney in Charleston. According to Harris, whether it requires asking for a loan from the bank, draining a 401(k) account, taking a second mortgage out on a home, or borrowing money from family and friends, there is no price that is too high when it comes to securing your freedom.

By:
Stephen Harrisl
Lawl
Oct 02, 2010

Having an Attorney to Get Ready for Your Trial

As the owner of the Law Office of Stephen Harris and a seasoned criminal defense attorney in Charleston, Stephen Harris says that getting ready for trial can be a long and confusing process. Having a skilled criminal defense attorney working on your behalf is one important way to put your worries at ease in this type of situation.

By:
Stephen Harrisl
Lawl
Oct 02, 2010

How to Get Charges Dismissed in a DUI Case

Stephen Harris is the owner of the Law Office of Stephen Harris, where he works as an attorney on DUI defense cases for clients in Charleston and the surrounding areas. According to Harris, building a strong defense in any DUI case should start with hiring the right lawyer, because a defendant who does not have a qualified lawyer on his side will have very little chance of ever getting his charges dismissed by a judge.

By:
Stephen Harrisl
Lawl
Oct 02, 2010

The Differences between Misdemeanors and Felonies

Stephen Harris is the owner of the Law Office of Stephen Harris, where he works as a defense attorney for clients in Charleston and the surrounding areas. According to Harris, knowing the differences between a felony and a misdemeanor is very important—especially to a person who is being charged with a criminal offense.

By:
Stephen Harrisl
Lawl
Oct 02, 2010

Add new Comment

Your Name: *

Your Email:

Comment Body: *

 

Verification code:*

* Required fields

Submit

Your Articles Here
It’s Free and easy

Sign Up Today


Author Navigation

My Home
Publish Article
View/Edit Articles
View/Edit Q&A
Edit your Account
Manage Authors
Statistics Page
Personal RSS Builder
My Home
Edit your Account
Update Profile
View/Edit Q&A
Publish Article
Author Box


Stephen Harris has 6 articles online

Contact Author

Subscribe to RSS

Print article

Send to friend

Re-Publish article

Articles Categories
All Categories

Advertising
Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Beauty
Business
Careers
Computers
Education
Finance
Food and Beverage
Health
Hobbies
Home and Family
Home Improvement
Internet
Law
Marketing
News and Society
Relationships
Self Improvement
Shopping
Spirituality
Sports and Fitness
Technology
Travel
Writing

Law

Bankruptcy
Copyright
Criminal
Cyber Law
Health and Safety
Immigration
Intellectual Property
Internet Law
National, State, Local
Patents
Personal Injury
Regulatory Compliance
Trademarks

]]>

Need Help?
Contact Us
FAQ
Submit Articles
Editorial Guidelines
Blog

Site Links
Recent Articles
Top Authors
Top Articles
Find Articles
Site Map
Mobile Version

Webmasters
RSS Builder
RSS
Link to Us

Business Info
Advertising

Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2011 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved.

Stephen Harris is a writer for Yodle, a business directory and online advertising company. Find a<a rel=”nofollow” onclick=”javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/outgoing/article_exit_link/3387555']);” href=”<a rel=”nofollow” onclick=”javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/outgoing/article_exit_link/3387555']);” href=”http://local.yodle.com/articles”>http://local.yodle.com/articles”>lawyer</a> or more <a rel=”nofollow” onclick=”javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/outgoing/article_exit_link/3387555']);” href=” http://local.yodle.com/articles/topics/legal-services/”>lawyers</a> articles at Yodle Consumer Guide.

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , ,

Church says document fraud is only civil violation of federal code & police should go after real criminals?

Church says document fraud is only civil violations of federal code & police should go after real criminals, isn’t document fraud a felony ?The five principles of the Utah Compact acknowledge that 1) immigration is a federal policy issue 2) local law enforcement should go after dangerous criminals 3) family immigration is important 4) immigrants add to the local economy and that 5) Utah should welcome immigrants. The wide range of supporters endorsing these principles include the Salt Lake Chamber, Former U.S. Senator Jake Garn, Former Governor Olene Walker, the Utah Attorney General, the Deseret News and numerous religious groups, such as the Catholic Diocese of Salt Lake and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS). Although not an official signer, LDS endorsed the compact with a statement of support:

The church regards the declaration of the Utah Compact as a responsible approach to the urgent challenge of immigration reform. It is consistent with important principles for which we stand.

http://www.alternet.org/immigration/148900/mormon_church_joins_supporters_for_progressive_immigration_reform,_helping_sink_arizona-like_bill

To have and find work it is a well known fact one must use some form of document fraud,why is the church saying, you do not enforce that law ?

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why is Obama not going after cities refusing to comply with federal law regulating illegal immigration?

Although the Obama Administration is targeting Arizona and other states that are directing local police officers more latitude in enforcing the nation’s immigration laws, the President, Attorney General Eric Holder, Immigration & Customs Enforcement chief John Morton and others are ignoring states and cities that are refusing to comply with federal law regulating illegal immigration.

While local governments across the U.S. work to contain the devastating impact of illegal immigration, lawmakers in one Midwest city are considering enacting legislation to attract undocumented immigrants — a/k/a illegal aliens.

Members of the City Council in Iowa City announced last week that they are contemplating passing a measure to make their municipality a sanctuary for illegal immigrants. The idea was introduced by a group of influential community leaders that believe illegal immigrants should have protections, according to Judicial Watch, a public-interest group that investigates political corruption and abuse.

Iowa City seeks to gain an exemption from a program (Secure Communities) that requires local authorities to check the fingerprints of arrestees against a federal database.

The idea of Secure Communities, which is run by the Homeland Security Department’s Immigration & Customs Enforcement directorate, or ICE, is to deport dangerous criminal aliens, many of whom have fallen through the cracks over the years.

The city’s legal department is preparing the paperwork for council members to consider and several officials, including the police chief, have met to discuss offering illegal immigrants sanctuary. That means the city will shield illegal aliens from federal immigration authorities and no public resources—including police—will be used to enforce immigration laws.

http://www.examiner.com/law-enforcement-in-national/sanctuary-city-heartland-city-pushes-for-non-enforcement-of-immigration-laws

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Powered by Yahoo! Answers